Jon Lynch Financial Group

State Commercial Financing Disclosure Laws 2026: an MCA broker's map

By Jonathan Lynch · Published 2026-07-02 · Current as of July 2026 · Free to reuse (CC BY 4.0)

In 2018, exactly one state — California — required disclosures on commercial financing. As of mid-2026, at least ten states do, and the pace is accelerating: Texas and Louisiana both enacted sales-based-financing disclosure laws in 2025, and California tightened its rules again with SB 362 effective January 1, 2026. For merchant cash advance (MCA) and revenue-based-financing brokers, "which states regulate this?" is no longer a niche question. This is the practical map.

10states with disclosure laws (from 1 in 2018)
5require provider/broker registration
$250K–$2.5Mrange of dollar thresholds
2025Texas & Louisiana — newest to enact
Jan 1, 2026California SB 362 tightens the rules
APR-styledisclosure now the norm, TILA-like

1. The trend: a slow trickle became a wave

Adoption clustered hard in 2024–2025. Four states reached effective disclosure requirements in 2024 (Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Connecticut) and the 2025 wave (Missouri, Texas, plus Louisiana) pushed the count to double digits.

220224202382024102025
Cumulative U.S. states with an effective commercial financing disclosure requirement, year-end (10 canonical states; California's rules became operative in 2022). Sources below.

2. The state-by-state map

StateLaw / effectiveThresholdRegistrationProduct scope
CaliforniaSB 1235 (rules eff. 2022); SB 362 eff. Jan 1, 2026≤ $500KLender licensing (CFL)All commercial financing
New YorkCFDL — eff. Aug 1, 2023≤ $2.5MAll commercial financing
UtahReg. & Disclosure Act — eff. Jan 1, 2023(broad)Yes — DFICommercial financing
Virginiaeff. Jul 1, 2022(sales-based)Yes — SCCSales-based financing
Floridamandatory compliance Jan 1, 2024≤ $500KCommercial financing
Georgiaeff. Jan 1, 2024 (FBPA amend.)≤ $500KCommercial financing
KansasComm. Financing Disclosure Act — eff. Jul 1, 2024≤ $500KCommercial financing
MissouriSB 1359 (§427.300) — eff. 2025≤ $500KYes — broker + surety bondCommercial financing
Connecticutregistration by Oct 1, 2024≤ $250KYes — Dept. of BankingSales-based financing
TexasHB 700 — disclosure eff. Sep 1, 2025; OCCC reg. by Dec 31, 2026(sales-based)Yes — OCCCSales-based financing

Thresholds are the upper limit below which disclosures apply (transactions above the cap are generally exempt). "Sales-based financing" is the statutory term most states use for MCAs. Louisiana also enacted a 2025 law and is not shown in the table pending final effective-date guidance.

3. Three shifts every broker should track

a) From disclosure to registration. Early laws (California, New York) focused on what you must disclose. Newer ones increasingly require who may operate: Utah, Virginia, Connecticut, Missouri, and Texas all layer in provider or broker registration — and Missouri adds a surety-bond requirement. Registration deadlines have teeth (Texas: register with the OCCC by December 31, 2026).

b) MCAs are named directly. Several states now write "sales-based financing" into the statute — the exact structure of a merchant cash advance — so brokers can't assume a commercial-purpose carve-out. Virginia, Connecticut, and Texas are explicitly sales-based-financing regimes.

c) Language itself is regulated. California's SB 362 (effective January 1, 2026) restricts using the words "rate" and "interest" in ways the DFPI considers misleading, and forces re-disclosure of APR under its methodology. The direction of travel is toward standardized, APR-style, TILA-like disclosure — even though these are commercial, not consumer, transactions.

4. What it means for brokers

If you broker MCA or revenue-based financing across state lines, treat compliance as a per-state checklist, not a national default: (1) know each state's dollar threshold — a $180,000 advance is squarely inside every disclosure regime, while a $700,000 advance is exempt in most; (2) know where you must register before you solicit (Texas, Connecticut, Virginia, Utah, Missouri); (3) make sure your funder's disclosure documents actually satisfy the state where the merchant is located, since liability can reach brokers, not just providers. The transparent brokers win here — the disclosure a regulator mandates is the same disclosure a good broker was already giving.

For the broker-economics and paperwork side of this, see how MCA brokers get paid and ISO agreement vs. direct funder.

5. What it means for merchants

If you're a business owner, these laws are on your side: in a covered state you're entitled to a standardized breakdown — total funds, total repayment, estimated APR, payment amount and frequency, and prepayment terms — before you sign. If you don't get one, ask. (Our plain-English guide to reading a working-capital quote covers what to look for.)

Not legal advice. This is a practitioner's summary for general information, compiled from the public legal-tracker and regulator sources listed below and current as of July 2026. Statutes, effective dates, thresholds, and registration deadlines change and contain exemptions this overview does not capture. Verify current requirements with each state's regulator or qualified counsel before acting.
Cite this report
Jon Lynch Financial Group. State Commercial Financing Disclosure Laws 2026: An MCA Broker's Map. July 2026. https://jonlynchfinancial.com/research/state-commercial-financing-disclosure-laws-2026/
Licensed CC BY 4.0 — free to quote, chart, and link with attribution. Media/data requests: [email protected]

Sources